TheApple Feedback & Requests >> Feedback & Requests >> A Very "Sticky" Problem...
A Very "Sticky" Problem...
|
750 posts back to top |
Posted 5 months ago This is a story that has been unravelling in my life for several years. It's about money and thievery and trust. When I was teaching, I ran the Enrichment program in a small, rural community, in the 47th poorest state in the union. We had no money to do projects, buy books, provide learning material or supplies. I had no classroom, no desk, no telephone, no copy machine, no paper, no pencils. I was given nothing...not even a map to locate my 15 schools within the 144 sq. miles of our school district. For the first few years I used my own money to finance our projects. Eventually I pestered and complained enough to get my basic needs met : a desk at the central office (administration), a code to use their telephone, a code to use their copy machine...nevermind that the central office was 30 miles from 3 of my 15 schools. Still, if I were organized, I could prepare in advance for the 3 days a week when I serviced those schools. As time passed, and teachers, parents, principals, and supervisors saw that my program existed, and was gaining popularity ~ I began to receive a small "budget". They would allocate me a few hundred dollars a year for supplies...it wasn't enough. So money for travel, special projects, and community events still came from my own pocket. It took me a while to realize that the program should be paying for itself, and if the school district wasn't going to cover our expenses, then we needed to be "fund raising". So, I organized the parents and together we began having bake sales, toy sales, raffles, community-wide Star Gazing events (for which we charged $1 per person)... oh, we worked our patutties-off ! I supplied the initial expense, then would be paid back after each event, from our earnings. My students and I had a dream. We wanted to go to Marine World in SanDiego and swim with the dolphins as part of a study on Interspecies Communication. And we wanted to go to Space Camp. They were Big Dreams for a small, poor school district...but, they were our dreams ~ so we stashed away our funds and kept working. I wrote a letter and sent it off to 30 of the major newspapers in the US, asking them to run an ad (free-of-charge) seeking an "Angel" for my gifted kids. Nothing ever came of it...evidently, there are no more angels. Now, most of us know that fund-raising monies usually go into the business office at your school district, they create a "line-item" in the budget profile, and there are "steps", ummm, "procedures" one must go-through in order to access that money. Well, we saved and saved and one day I decided I would use some of those 'stashed away' funds to buy some student portfolio materials. When I went through the steps, the business manager for the district told me that we didn't have any money in our account....it had been spent. As the series-of-events unravelled, it turned out that our SpecEd supervisor had used it to purchase her spiffy new office desk, ergonomic chair, bookshelves, etc....and spent almost $1,000 of our hard-earned money. (No, we never saw that money again.) Soooo, the parent committee for my program decided we should not keep our 'independent earnings' within the school district anymore. One of the mom's opened a savings account at our local credit union under the name "Enrichment Program". The account she opened was a non-interest bearing account (since she didn't think it would be there for very long, and she didn't want to have to track the pennies it would earn). Once again we went to work. We sold baked-items and toys at local craft fairs, did lunch-time popcorn sales at the schools, more raffles ~ this time I put out several hundred dollars from my own pocket to buy supplies for the high school students to build a Tough Shed, which we then raffled off.... oh, I promise you, it was serious, hard work! And the largest part fell on my shoulders. Though, there was this one mom (who was the parent committee treasurer, who open the credit union account) that worked very hard, too. She was my mainstay. Her son was in my program and she devoted herself to helping. We became true friends. I went to her home for dinner several times, met her husband...we were/are friends. One thing led to another... and, after a year or so, I took a fall and injured my lower-back. My injury was serious. For 2 years I kept trying to return to work, but, I'd last a few months then succumb to the pain and be out for the year. Eventually I realized that I could not do my job anymore. I had to quit. There was no alternative, it wasn't fair to the kids ~ when I was out they had no teacher! So, I left my position. Each new teacher that the program would get, I would tell her that there was $1,600 in the credit union that belonged to the program. I would encourage her to use the money for the students. It wasn't until last year that they finally got a teacher who was excited to hear there were monies for her students. I sent along the paperwork for withdrawl, which was signed by the parent-committee mom, who had moved from the state 2 years before I left. That mom's signature was needed to access these monies. One day a few months ago the teacher of the Enrichment Program called me (from 1,200 miles away) to tell me that the Credit Union had no money in that account....$1,600 was missing. Now, this may not sound like a whole lot of money to you...but it was a whole lot of work and when no one else is willing to help financially, even pennies feel like GOLD. Besides, one 'financially responsible institution' had already absorbed $1k of our hard-earned funds...and now... well, they weren't going to get away with it. I was ready to "blow the whistle", "halt traffic", and hire an attorney. Then, yesterday, the "new" teacher for The Enrichment Program phoned to tell me they had traced-down the person who withdrew the funds...it was that mom, whom I'm still friends with, that came back from her new home in Colorado, three years after she'd moved away, and a year after I'd left the district. She returned and, using her valid Colorado Driver's License, withdrew all our funds. There are really too many details to tell the entire story, the above is a synopsis... here's my problem : SHE'S MY FRIEND! She has even been involved in the investigation to find the funds. She has complained to me about the lost money, saying it should have been for the kids, that her son was supposed to be able to go to Space Camp on that money. And, still, she has known all along that she's the one who took it. Now, here's the unspoken issue: she's a drinker. I've known this all along. I haven't made a big issue out of it, because that is her personal business. I f she wanted to tell me her problems, then I would have listened ~ but, I think she's a closet alcoholic, and so long as she stayed in the closet, it wasn't my business to go prying around....sigh. I met her when her son was in 2nd grade....he's now 22 years old. We have been friends for all these years, across all these miles...we send cards, and small gifts (when appropriate)...we talk on the phone every couple months or so...we have nick-names for each other...I've written her letters-of-reference trying to help her find work....ooooh...my....gawd.... Now the "new" Enrichment Program teacher is going to send me a fax of the withdrawal paper work, and I'm supposed to talk to "my friend" about what happened to our Enrichment Program Money. It's a very "sticky" problem. I just feel so let-down and dissappointed. I don't want to just come out and make an accusation. Do you think this "paperwork" constitutes factual, concrete evidence? Maybe there's an explanation? How can I approach her with such a delicate, personal issue? Is my "friend" a thief? Think of this: even if it is all true, will she admit to it? If she does not admit it....what am I left with? I need advice. In the months that I have been coming on TheApple, I've grown to trust that the opinions I receive from you are carefully considered by intelligent minds...and together we have at least a century worth of experience....who has a simliar experience to draw from?...who can give me the right words for my dicussion with her? How will I be able to trust what she's telling me? Does it even matter? Help....please. ~ a very sad debo
|
|
5 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago I'd say, don't beat around the bush. Just ask her what happened. Her response will tell you what you need to do. |
|
200 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago I' m so sorry, debo! I'm sorry for your sadness, things would be much easier if you weren't emotionally involved. This is a really complex situation! People do unbelievable things in straitened circumstances...
...who can give me the right words for my dicussion with her? How will I be able to trust what she's telling me? Does it even matter? Although I would very much like to help...I'm afraid noone can give you the right words to begin the discussion with ...I'm afraid, only you will know the right answers, choose the right words and it's you who decide how much it matters to you to lose her as a friend or not ( if she is that at all?). I just know one thing: The truth matters. I hope the sunshine comes out of these dark clouds soon, Mateja
PS. I think the evidence is clear! |
|
750 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Well, yah, thanks "Ransom"... but, if she's been lying to me for the past 8 years... This sounds like a nice, neat little answer: brief, to the point, no-nonsense...a man answer. It would be great if life were so simple. How should I put it to her?..."Emily, did you steal $1,600 from your son's school program?" (no, her name isn't Emily) So, then, when she gives the simple, clear, clean-cut answer, "No." What next? "Then, why does the bank statement show your signature?" as if this were a question that she could answer... ...if a person states that they are innocent, and if the question-er believes they are innocent....wouldn't the questions stop there? To continue questioning implies a lack of faith in the answer-given (which is what I have)...which leads right into the ol', "yes, you did" / "no I didn't" line of argument...which only alienates the speakers and leads to dissolution of friendships. If the person you have "friended" has been lying and covering-up ~ are you really friends? Maybe my biggest problem is not knowing what I expect from her, or from the conversation...am I going into this in order to dissolve our friendship? If it is the alcoholism to blame, wouldn't I be the poor "friend" for not understanding that it is a disease? Jeeze. I do care. I just don't know what to do. |
|
1150 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Ask outright. Say you have the withdrawal copy with signature. Say you want it returned. Close the friendship. Children are the living messages we will send into a time we will not see. – John W. Whitehead |
|
71 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Debo, I know this is a very sensitive issue for you Debo? However, to state your friend has alcoholism! or possible drug use period is a major issue! So, if you suspect not to get the truth from this person...You probably will not get the truth. If you are owe something..You can ask your friend about this information....to get the sole truth....you will not possible get it.....! Yet, when confronting your friend go in a manner of asking questions out of curorsity....? Also, let her know up front what you know...talk in a manner of friendship and dialogue...Yet, express your feelings on how things made you feel.....also let her know that you are seek truth and clarity......Again, know if someone is battling a drug problem their truth is the only thing they see or understand. So, if you have to take legal action and have enough documentation for reasonable doubt.....then do what you need to do to help yourself. I wish you much luck on your sticky problem I am a down to earth person. I love to have friends over and talk about life. I love to cook and have friends over. I enjoy planning weddings and parties. My most favorite thing is to go to the SPA...it is a deal breaker for me |
|
750 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Yes, Km, I have to approach this as a friend would...not be all "accusatory" or "angry". Alcoholism is a disease. And I do know that she can only see the world from her own pov, so I shouldn't expect more than she can give. (When my beloved sister-friend was dying of cancer the Hospice worker told me that with the very-elderly and the terminally-ill, they draw into themselves, and "all their windows become mirrors"... this might be true with substance abusers as well.) I already know that she is not in the financial position to be paying the money back. But, the program is no longer my responsibility. I cannot control what they will chose to do about this. I can only control my own reactions. I think I'm so offended because I am still attached to the Enrichment Program ~ emotionally. I have never processed the bad feelings from the way I was treated...which is what my Blog is all about : trying to process the negativity so I can let go of it. Now, this comes up before I've gotten the whole nasty business out of my system...and I feel befuddled. I thank you for your reply because it has helped to bring some clarity! I need to stay in my truthful center. I need to have compassion for her without subverting my own standards. I think SanMac also hit the nail-on-the-head. I need to let go. Whew. I need to let go. This is the difficult part. When I build friendships I tend to be loyal beyond reason. I do not easily let-go of friends. This is why I have so many 30+ year friendships....and they are very rewarding...but, sometimes letting go is the right thing to do. I have had 3 friends who committed suicide...when this happens I always think, "Why? How could I have helped? In what way did I fail my friend?" Letting-go of friends isn't so easy for me. Just as with the children at school : we don't know what goes on at their house, when they come to school it might be the high-light of their life, and the smile you give them may be the only one they'll get that day. What if I'm one of those fine threads that holds things together for my friend? How will I know what effect ending our friendship will have on her? I do believe that I need to 'let go' of my friend....but, how am I going to stop worrying about her? How do you STOP being friends? How do I STOP caring?
|
|
2671 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Dear debo, I've always considered loyalty to be one of the most important virtues; it's right near the top of my personal list. Loyalty, though, like respect, needs to be something that is earned before it's given. And it also has to be a "two-way street," a mutual giving and receiving. Who would be loyal to someone who wouldn't return the favor. Speaking as an alcoholic (one who hasn't had a drink for eight years now), I can empathize with the lady's situation. We drunks can do some really terrible things when we're under the influence, things we'd never even consider doing when sober. However, it's been a while since the money was taken, and I'm sure the lady must have been sober at some point since then. And if you do something bad when you're drunk, you certainly ought to try to rectify it when you're sober. Sandra's right - though you might want to be more gentle when you talk to her than Sandra's post seemed to imply (and I'm sure you will be.) But you do need to "let go"; the lady did a while back. Loyalty is precious, but loyalty "beyond reason" is, well, unreasonable. You don't have to stop worrying about her, though it won't do any good, of course. And you could even offer to be a listener should she need someone to talk to, But you do, I think, have to make it clear to her that by betraying your trust, she's forfeited your trust. I'd even say that you could still be a "limited friend", there for her if she needs someone. But once burned , , , , |
|
5 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Debo, Sorry if you think that my answer was a "man answer". I never claimed to be Anne Landers (who was as direct most of the time). But IMHO, you need to be direct and matter-of-fact, leaving emotion and feelings of loyalty aside for a moment. You don't have to attack her in your accusation; just lay the dilemma out clearly. No one here can tell you if the paperwork constitutes "factual" or hard evidence. If there's an explanation, she will give it to you. You will either be satisfied with her answer or not. But if theft is suspected, it is certainly not up to you to follow through and make some kind of "ruling". It would seem to me to be up to some higher authority to decide if prosecution was in order or not. That just leaves you with the decision of to be understanding and sympathetic to her situation, or to cut all ties and move on. That's the end of my manly advice. |
|
1150 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Echoing John, friendship, loyalty, respect are two-way streets. Children are the living messages we will send into a time we will not see. – John W. Whitehead |
|
2671 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Dear debo, I was thinking about this again this morning, and I realized something: if my friendships had all ended because of the stupid/bad things I've done, I'd be friendless today. I guess forgive - but don't forget - is the way to go. I went through my list of close friends, and I realized that, if any of them had done something like what the lady did, I would NOT "end the friendship." We ALL have done bad/stupid things; should the consequence be losing those we have friendship/love for? I'd say that's too harsh a punishment for screwing up. Everyone deserves a second (but maybe not a third, fourth) chance. To err is human - and you know the rest. |
|
750 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Thank you all so much... It's very difficult. I have a mushy place in my heart for my friend. I don't want to confront her with this stuff...I don't even want to know this stuff...but, I know I have to...this week....and it feels like a 'weight' hanging over me. Ransom & San....I know you were just cutting-to-the-chase...keeping it clean and sharp....I also know that you've given me good, clear, advice. It's just that it isn't so clear-cut when one's heart is involved... I want to make all kinds of excuses for my friend's behavior...which, of course, is inexcusable....siiigh. John's particular brand of insight hit the bull's eye this morning ~ even brought tears to my eyes... we, as human beings, face all kinds of difficult choices in our life times... some are more clear than others... and often we make wrong choices... but, who am I to judge her? If I am truly her friend, I should be the LAST one to throw a stone... so, if I was her friend before I knew this, then I should have the intestinal fortitude and personal stamina to stand-by... after all it is her life that she's messing up, not mine. Even though, this time her actions have affected those around her...crrrap...okay-okay, yes, her actions ARE screwing with the happiness and well-being of others...and the others she has harmed are my students. If this had happened while the Program was still in my hands, I would have felt like a mother tiger defending her babies! (it's odd, but I still feel that irrational need to defend my students ~ as if they were my children...) But, the damage was done long ago, and most of the students still in the program are not even aware that the money was ever there in the first place...they're kids, they don't even care about this sort of thing...and, I'm glad that only a small ring of people know...why should everyone feel as hurt as I'm feeling? Yes, a basic trust has been broken. Even if I am able to still be a "distant" friend, I don't believe she will accept this...I think my friend is going to feel so much shame and remorse that she will not be able to face me, as a 'friend', again. I think she will cut-the-tie between us so she can "stay in the closet"... ....it is going to be her ending the friendship...not me....she is going to cut-me-off.... because I represent that which she is running from>>>responsibility. Is my thinking straight on this John? ...she may even hang-up on me...just that I know will be a weight too heavy for her to bear... I need to be prepared for this. She will likely reject any offer I might make to retain our friendship. She may even get angry with me...to avoid facing the hard truth. In the privacy of her home, she may go on a binge. When her husband and son figure out what's going on, she may try to blame me ~ so they'll still be on her side, seeing me as the enemy... isn't that true? In desperation she may say anything to shift the blame. I grew up seeing alcoholism in my family...it's a horrible thing. I tried to go to Alanon (for families of alcoholics), but there were no facilities where I lived. I have attended AA meetings and NA meetings with family members, so I have learned some valuable information ~ but I never really had the training...so, I'm still in need of guidance. I did recognize myself described as "the hero child", the one who tries to make everything still look good to the outter world, the one who keeps the house clean, meals on the table, gets children off to school...you know, the one who makes everything still APPEAR SANE AND NORMAL : an enabler. You know, perhaps my anxiety over this issue is connected to my own early-life-experiences, and this is why I feel so "lost" and "disconnected" and "fearful" over the whole mess. Sheece. If we don't work the issues, they come back and bite us in the buttocks! Maybe I cannot let go of my friend, because I couldn't let go of my family members, and it's all connected in my brain to this huge fear of losing everything...losing love... losing family....losing friends.... just "LOSS". This is as much my issue as it is her's. We all belong to the Family of Humanity, and we owe it to one another to hold-on...and be patient... and understanding... and we owe it to one another to NOT give up. Who the hell am I to judge her? It isn't up to me to forgive her...she has to do that. Yes, beyond the anger and fear there is a voice which whispers, "Love is the answer...". How do I get there from here? I can't see it. I know it isn't right for me to give her the "cold-shoulder"... that's clear enough... so, if I phone her and she goes-off on me and hangs up... how will I deal with my own feelings? pppphhhhtttt! this isn't easy. Thank you, every single one of you, for devoting your time and insight to my problem. I do appreciate your kindness. ~debo
|
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Debo, I can only imagine what you are having to deal with. However, I would like to suggest a few options that may help. 1. Stop assuming all the responsibility for the situation. 2. All relationships have limits and boundaries. When you are invested (either financially, emotionally, physically, or time) in a project, it is difficult to process problems without a basic plan of action. (a) If you want to confront her on an issue, WRITE IT DOWN and have evidence to support your position. I'm not talking about bringing in lawyers and police, just have a copy of the relevant paperwork available. (b) Arrange for a meeting at a public place that is neutral, such as a library, so that everyone is more comfortable. (c) Let her see that you have a list of questions to ask and space available for you to take notes. Offer to make a photocopy of the notes you take for her to keep. That way she can read what you understand as the explanation. (d) Bring tissues. This sounds like a very emotional issue, so be prepared. Leaving the table to get tissue from the bathroom will give too many opportunities to rebuild any emotional walls. (e) Once you begin talking to her about the situation, ask to present your information first and encourage her to take notes. Provide an outline of information so she can see that you don't have surprises, and that you are not here to ambush her. (f) Phrase your questions so that you are clarifying the situation, not accusing anyone of anything. A question like, "I understand that an amount of $1600 was withdrawn on MM/DD/YY. Will you please tell me what you know about this situation?" is open and allows her to form an explanation. (g) Be prepared to hear both a denial and a confession. If she confesses, have a list of steps that she will need to follow to pay restitution. If she denies any responsibility for it, ask her if she is willing to help track down the person who is responsible for it. Encourage her to provide evidence that she is innocent. Offer to support her as long as she tells the truth. (h) The more she sees you as wanting to help, the more likely she will be willing to accept it. 3. An intervention for her alcoholism may be necessary. People are a lot more forgiving of those who are willing to admit when they are wrong and are willing to do what is necessary to make it right. Finally, be ready to end the friendship. You will gain nothing by abandoning your morals and standards in order to maintain a relationship with a person who cannot be fully honest with you. Good luck and God bless you. |
|
2671 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Dear SloanTaylor , I believe the "meeting" between debo and the lady will NOT be "in person" "I met her when her son was in 2nd grade....he's now 22 years old. We have been friends for all these years, across all these miles...we send cards, and small gifts (when appropriate)...we talk on the phone every couple months or so...we have nick-names for each other...I've written her letters-of-reference trying to help her find work....ooooh...my....gawd....Now the "new" Enrichment Program teacher is going to send me a fax of the withdrawal paper work, and I'm supposed to talk to "my friend" about what happened to our Enrichment Program Money." but on the phone. So (b), (c) and (d) are likely not relevant.
What I'd like to as you, though, is about this:
"You will gain nothing by abandoning your morals and standards in order to maintain a relationship with a person who cannot be fully honest with you."
Do you believe that all your friends have always been "fully honest" with you? Perhaps they have been, and, if so, may I congratulate you on having such totally honest friends. I rather doubt that all my friends have always been fully honest with me; in fact, I wonder if any human being is or has ever been fully honest with another. But perhaps I simply have too skeptical a view of human nature.
|
|
750 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Thanks for the "plan" John. I'll use it. It will need to modified a bit...you see she lives in Colorado and I'm in California...so all this will be done by telephone. Also, the woman who is now the teacher of that program has talked to her about locating the funds, and so have I. The three of us have been trying to figure out what happened. I have already had several conversations with her re: the lost money. She denies having anything to do with it...said she remembers handing all the paperwork over to the school distrcit when she moved from the state. So, since she left the state 2 years before I did, I thought that was concrete evidence that it could not have been her. I encouraged the new teacher to investigate and pay the fees for the credit union (where the money was stashed) to research the paperwork that would show who signed for the withdrawal. When the new teacher called me to say they had finally found the withdrawal form, and told me that it was my friend who had signed for it, my heart slipped to my toes...I said 'it couldn't have been her, she didn't even live in the state any longer!' Then, she told me that the paperwork appeared to be her signature because they had a photo copy of her Driver's License to match the signature....and, it was a Colorado DL. So. Here's what I know: She has already denied the responsibility. She doesn't have the funds to repay it. She hasn't phoned me for 2 weeks. She's getting ready to return to the state and town where it all happened (the whole family is moving back there). ON YOUR LIST BELOW # 2.a. I can, and will, write out what I plan to say (so I can keep on track in a highly emotional conversation). I will have a fax of the form with her signature on it. #2 d. I will have tissues close. #2. f. I will keep my questions open-ended, not to "attack" her. Should I offer to send a copy of the fax to her? It will have to go through the snail-mail, so maybe I should mail it and wait a few days prior to making the phone call? #2. g. A plan for restitution...I don't have that...she'll have to deal with the new teacher on this one...but, I do know that she cannot afford to repay the money...even though I might encourage her to contact the current teacher ~ I'm not sure she will be willing. What should I do if she flat refuses? #3. An intervention. Oh man. Talk to me more about this one, please. I'm so far from her, and this drinking thing is their 'family secret'...is it my position to bring this up? I do want her to get help... Oh maaan. Last: ending the frienship. Please, will you suggest some dialogue for doing this... how do you say to someone "I don't want to be your friend any more"... it's just so heartless and cruel. How can I say those words? What if I'm her only life-line...what if she hurts herself over something like this? OMG.... you know, for her to end up with this problem she must have experienced trauma in her younger years, too. How can I fail to have sympathy? There go my excuses again. IF I were to end the friendship, how would I go about that without hurting her even more? Do you think I might just "avoid" calling her? Avoid her calls to me? Slowly sever communication? [this doesn't sound right, or "upstanding"] Just a little more guidance please. P.S. I've written this entire reply thinking you were my friend John. Now I see you are "Sloan". Excuse me. Here I am deep into this conversation, and I've never seen you on here before... are you a professional counselor? Please introduce yourself. And, thanx for your support.
|
|
11 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago I would give you another 'man' answer and recommend having a lawyer write a letter demanding repayment prior to action. She has not stolen money from you......she stole it from the children. Having been in the fundraising business for over 28 years, I have had way too much experience with misplaced morals. I have had to work with non-profit groups to conduct a second fundraiser to raise enough money to pay the first bill because of sticky finger treasurers. I have read notes from parents explaining that the lights were about to be turned off so they had to use the fundraising money to take care of family business and the school (or my company) would just have to understand. I get $50/month payments from a pastor who's church day care lost all their money. It will take him too long to pay off the $3000 debt they owe me. As a Band Director, I let parents sign an 'agreement' with the band.....so that I could let their children get on the bus to Disney with the promise of paying off the balance of their responsibility later. Now that they have made that trip, the piece of paper seems to be worthless. They didn't steal my money.... it was the money that so many other students and parents raised. We live in a world where morals, right and wrong are all relative. How can it be okay to steal money if you are an alcoholic? There is no justification for wrong-doing, in my mind. If we could get back to the now illegal-to-post 10 Commandments, your situation is addressed. I have a plaque in my fundraising office that says, "What part of 'Thou Shalt Not' do you not understand? -God" I'd probably be fired for posting that plaque in my bandroom office. Well, maybe not.....I have a supportive Christian principal..... but when we took God and prayer out of the schools.... we are now dealing with those children -- as the parents of the children in our schools today. |
|
750 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Hey BandMan ! Then again, there's always, "Love One Another" and "Do Unto Others as ye would have them do unto you" and, "Judge Not Lest Ye Be Judged" and "Am I my Brother's Keeper?" ... and, and, and, "LOVE ONE ANOTHER" ...seems to be the kicker. Yes, people do bad things all the time...and, GOOD people do bad things, too....from desperation....or illness (physical and mental)...or for any number of reasons...human beings make poor choices ~ it's the nature of the beast.
Well, this week slipped past without a word from the new Enrichment Teacher who is supposed to provide me with the concrete evidence via fax, prior to my conversation with my "friend". So, I'm still waiting for the other shoe to drop... Thanks for your response!
|
|
2671 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Dear BandDirFundRaiser,
". . . we took God and prayer out of the schools.... we are now dealing with those children -- as the parents of the children in our schools today.
"I get $50/month payments from a pastor who's church day care lost all their money. It will take him too long to pay off the $3000 debt they owe me."
Considering what happened to the "church day care", maybe the schools saved a lot of money when "we took God and prayer out of the schools." Actually, neither God nor prayer has been removed from schools - I'm sure many students, teachers and administrators bring Him there everyday - in their hearts and minds. And as for prayer, perhaps the best, most authentic ones are said not with the lips but silently.
"The Pharisee begins his “prayer” with words that one would not expect from a person of God: “God, I thank you that I am not like other men: extortionists, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get.”
“The tax collector, standing far off, would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, 'God, be merciful to me a sinner!” After hearing these two different prayers, I believe we can all see the difference between them. The “prayer” of the Pharisee was self-glorification: it was a way for him to feel better about himself, justifying his attitude to God and – in a sense – completely ‘missing the mark’ on what true prayer is. And so, this “prayer” was filled with hypocrisy. Matthew 6:5-6: "And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men....when thou prayest, enter into thy closet and when thou has shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret...." |
|
462 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago John, They took corporate prayer out of schools. We can still pray. I pray at lunch everyday, I also carry my Bible in my bag. I cannot ask someone other than my daughter to pray during school hours, but I can do it independently. During the moment of silence everyday, I pray. Every cloud has a silver lining. |
|
11 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago Of course there can still be silent, personal prayer in school. And yes, prayer can be for wrong reasons. I'm not disagreeing with any of you. My point goes more this direction; if we took the pledge out of the school, how long would it be before we had a generation of students who didn't know the pledge, even though they could site it privately on their own? And, secondly, that taking religious (moral) education out of the schools is part of the cause (I believe) that we have some of the problems that we do in education and society today. They can pray in the Supreme Court, and in Congress, i.e. government institutions...... but not in government schools. Hypocrisy. |
|
462 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago They are working on taking it from there as well. It is my belief that they can pass legislation that bans corporate this and that, but they cannot tell me that I cannot lead by example. Our children listen more to our actions than they do to our words. Stop and watch. So is it really the fault of legislation telling us we cannot preach it or is it our feeling of loss that has given the excuse to not teach it. Lead by moral model, not by tell and do. Every cloud has a silver lining. |
|
750 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago So, BDFR.... whose morals do you think we should teach? What about this concept of separating church and state? If we did not separate them, would we end up in religious wars again? Please elaborate.
Thanx, ~debo |
|
2671 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago This letter seems relevant: "Michael W. Jones
Published: February 24, 2009 Charleston, S.C. - There have been two recent letters regarding prayer in schools. These letters cite the various results from the professed "elimination" of prayer in schools. However, neither author has taken the time to fully elaborate on the ruling of the Supreme Court in the leading case on the issue: Abington v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963). Editor's note: The author is a former Burke County student studying law in college in Charleston. http://www2.morganton.com/content/2009/feb/24/letter-supreme-court-... |
|
750 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago Well, John, it seems clear, according to this article, that prayer in school is not banned, it simply cannot be compelled....very interesting. However, I think my question still stands ~ if the school is State run, shouldn't religion be separated from academics? At least as our Constitution implies....? I believe in God. I pray. But, this does not seem to be the issue... it seems to me that separating Church from State is an attempt to allow everyone to have their own faith without infringing on the rights of others. This separation should make it easier for teachers, parents, and administrators to interact without the influence of opposing ideaologies heating-up and destroying communications. ie...I won't make you listen to my moral beliefs, if you won't make me listen to your's, or, I won't teach your children about my personal morality, if you don't teach me about your's...or "they" don't teach me about "their's". Do you agree that this was the intent of the Law that separates Church from State? |
|
677 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago debo says ...
|
|
750 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago Thanks Don, ...for your considered and considerate advice. I know you're right. It's taken some time, but I've come to see that my friend is lost to me. He son called me the other day... we discussed this, and his now disclosed drinking, and drugging habits. My eyes are open. I do care about them all... and my heart feels sad....but I cannot carry that weight. Because I still do care, I can listen, offer up advice...whatever... but I won't ever feel the same way, or trust on the level, that I had. Still, nothing has been said or resolved about the financial loss. The current teacher of the program says she is going to ask this woman to be the one to tell her son. She's left several messages on the answering machine, and received no response. I think this will never happen....the mother will not tell the son, neither will she respond to the current teacher's messages. I've decided there is no point in prosecuting my friend. As you say, she's ill. I've also decided to wait until she calls me (if ever) ~ then, just listen. Thanks for your in-put ~ I value it. BTW don't think I don't see your underlying strategy: you're going through the "Topics" and bringing conversations back to "the point" (ear-to-ear smile!) ~ I riiike it! ~debo |
|
11 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago We've really made a change in direction in this conversation. Where is the "separation of church and state" in the Constitution? Our founding fathers were much more interested in protecting the church from the state than the state from the church. Can anyone cite some of the early writings that indicate an interest in keeping anything related to religion and God out of schools? Having experienced the Church of England, they certainly didn't want government inteferring with religion. Whose morals? Thats the problem, isn't it. Those Ten Suggestions from Old Testament Scripture are the basis of most of our legal system, which is why they are part of the front of the Supreme Court building. When you throw that out, what you have is secular humanism where there are no absolutes. Its not wrong for your friend to take your money if she didn't think that it was wrong. With situational ethics, you can justify just about anything. Whether the Supreme Court banned prayer is not as important as the accepted interpretation of that ruling, As for the silent moment, I think ours is roughly 10 seconds. Better pray quick. In my community, just within the last year, the ACLU won a lawsuit against our community's weekday religious trailers, which the churches purchase, maintain and transport to school parking lots so that elementary school students have the option to walk outside the school house and into one of these trailers. Indiana law allows for that. But, with over 98% voluntary participation, one mother wins out. This is not a separation. This is an attack. My son has recently been blogging about his readings of the Federalist papers. Maybe we should all go back and read real history, not the history in our textbooks. I think we should now go back to your original topic. Oh, btw, one of those Ten Suggestions was something about stealing, was it not? |
|
2671 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago Here's an interpretation of the First Amendment: "
[81] The Senate began debate on the House amendments on September 3 and continued through September 9. The debate was conducted in secrecy and no record exists but the bare [82] account of motions and votes in the Senate Journal. According to the record of September 3, three motions of special interest here were defeated on that day. These motions restricted the ban in the proposed amendment to establishments preferring one sect above others. The first motion would have made the clause in the amendment read: “Congress shall make no law establishing one religious sect or society in preference to others…” After the failure of this motion and of another to kill the amendment, a motion was made to change it to read: “Congress shall not make any law infringing the rights of conscience, or establishing any religious sect or society.” The final defeated motion restated the same thought differently: “Congress shall make no law establishing any particular denomination of religion in preference to another…” The Senate then adopted the language of the House: “Congress shall make no law establishing religion…” The failure of these three motions, each of which seemed to express a narrow intent, and the adoption of the House version prove that the Senate intended something broader than merely a ban on preference to one sect. Yet, if anything is really clear about the problem of “meaning” and “intent” it is that little is clear; when the Senate returned to the clause six days later, it altered the House amendment to read: “Congress shall make no law establishing articles of faith or a mode of worship, or prohibiting the free exercise of religion…” Like the three previously defeated motions, this one had the unmistakable meaning of limiting the ban to acts that prefer one denomination over others or that, to put it simply, establish a single state church. [83] The Senate’s wording provoked the House to take action that made its intent clear, as the next step in the drafting of the amendment revealed. In voting on the Senate’s proposed amendments, the House accepted some and rejected others, including the Senate’s article on religion. To resolve the disagreement between the two branches, the House proposed a joint conference committee. The Senate refused to recede from its position but agreed to the proposal for a conference committee. The committee, a strong and distinguished one, consisted of Madison as chairman of the House conferees, joined by Sherman and Vining, and Ellsworth as chairman of the Senate conferees, joined by Paterson and Carroll. Four of the six men had been influential members of the Constitutional Convention. The House members of the conference flatly refused to accept the Senate’s version of the amendment on religion, indicating that the House would not be satisfied with merely a ban on preference of one sect or religion over others. The Senate conferees abandoned the Senate’s version, and the amendment was redrafted to give it its present phraseology. On September, Ellsworth reported to the Senate that the House would accept the Senate’s version of the other amendments provided that the amendment on religion “shall read as follows: Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” 0n the same day, the House sent a message to the Senate verifying Ellsworth’s report. On the next day, September 25, the Senate by a two-thirds vote accepted the condition laid down by the House.Congress had passed the establishment clause. The one fact that stands out is that Congress very carefully considered and rejected the wording that seems to imply the narrow interpretation. The House’s rejection of the Senate’s version of the amendment shows that the House did not [84] intend to frame an amendment that banned only congressional support of one sect, church, denomination, or religion. The Senate three times defeated versions of the amendment embodying that narrow interpretation, on a fourth vote adopted such a version, and finally abandoned it in the face of uncompromising hostility by the House. The amendment’s framers definitely intended something broader than the narrow interpretation which some judges and scholars have given it. At bottom the amendment expressed the fact that the Framers of the Constitution had not empowered Congress to act in the field of religion. The “great object” of the Bill of Rights, as Madison explicitly said when introducing his draft of amendments to the House, was to “limit and qualify the powers of Government” for the purpose of making certain that the powers granted could not be exercised in forbidden fields, such as religion. The history of the drafting of the establishment clause does not provide us with an understanding of what was meant by “an establishment of religion.” To argue, however, as proponents of a narrow interpretation do, that the amendment permits congressional aid and support to religion in general or to all denominations without discrimination, leads to the impossible conclusion that the First Amendment added to Congress’s power. Nothing supports such a conclusion. Every bit of evidence goes to prove that the First Amendment, like the others, was intended to restrict Congress to its enumerated powers. Because Congress possessed no power under the Constitution to legislate on matters concerning religion, Congress has no such power even in the absence of the First Amendment. It is therefore unreasonable, even fatuous, to believe that an express prohibition of power—“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”—vests or creates the power, previously nonexistent, of supporting religion by aid to all religious groups. The Bill of Rights, as Madison said, was not framed “to imply powers not meant to be included in the enumeration.” http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/globalrights/religion/levy-1sta... |
|
339 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago AMIGA DEBO: I'm late to the main topic but a new one is starting, Why don't you start it ? I would like to comment on it or should I do it here? |
|
339 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago I couldn't wait! What are the limits of the church in the north american schools? |


