Group Forums >> TheApple Book Club >> Books vs. Movies

Rate

Books vs. Movies

307 Views
20 Replies Flag as inappropriate
Img_0898_max50

199 posts

back to top

Posted 7 months ago

 

I have never been one to read fictional romance novels but I recently saw the movie “Twilight” and am now interested in reading the book.  When it comes to books that have movies, in general, do you prefer reading the book or watching the movie?  Is it better to read the book and then see the movie or the other way around?  Do you ever show movies in your class either before or after reading the book? 


 

100_0097_max50

494 posts

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted 7 months ago

 

In general the book is always better and the movie just ruins it (in alot of cases). 


Harry potter for one.Stargate for another.  If you are going to be showing the film


then I would suggest reading the book watch the movie and maybe let the students


do a compair and contrast paper.

Img_0898_max50

199 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 7 months ago

 

mrcrisp says ...



In general the book is always better and the movie just ruins it (in alot of cases). 


Harry potter for one.



Harry Potter was another book that I started reading after seeing the movie.  I only read the first 2 1/2 books before I became bored of them, but I still enjoy the movies.

Photo_54_max50

1583 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 7 months ago

 

If I've read the book I will not see the movie. I've got my own in my head and I know I like that one.


If I see the movie first I won't read the book. I want to make my own images, not re-see what someone else created.


I started this policy after watching the movie Catch-22. I had read the book several times and really enjoyed it. Movie was awful, but when I tried to read the book again I kept seeing images from the film. It ruined the book for me.


"What the teacher is, is more important than what he teaches." - Karl Menninger

Bobblehead_max50

857 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 7 months ago

 

Usually I am drawn to the book because of the movie but in the case of The Chronicles of Narnia, I read the books first and viewed the movies later. I thought the movie portrayed the book fairly well...at least very close to the way I pictured it.  


When it is the other way around, (movie than book) it's because the movie left me craving more and I know that the book contains more detailed information.


However, I am not a big movie buff and most of the books I read are Informational in nature such as how-to books.


The last movie I saw was Slumdog Millionaire and though I enjoyed it...I did not run out to get the book.

Matejka_max50

200 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 7 months ago

 

Deven says ...



If I've read the book I will not see the movie. I've got my own in my head and I know I like that one.


If I see the movie first I won't read the book. I want to make my own images, not re-see what someone else created.


I started this policy after watching the movie Catch-22. I had read the book several times and really enjoyed it. Movie was awful, but when I tried to read the book again I kept seeing images from the film. It ruined the book for me.



I agree completely. Reading a book..it means to establish an intimate duality between the book and the reader for me. So I don't want anybody else to interfere.


Catch-22, I've just read the book, luckily. Twice.


 


Sorry about my English!

Fruit_max50

51 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 7 months ago

 

bobblehead says ...




The last movie I saw was Slumdog Millionaire and though I enjoyed it...I did not run out to get the book.



The book is waaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyy better.... the movie is very loose in its interpretation..... Q&A is a masterpiece, Slumdog was kinda.... cheesy

Bobblehead_max50

857 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 7 months ago

 

JoannaPLT says ...



bobblehead says ...




The last movie I saw was Slumdog Millionaire and though I enjoyed it...I did not run out to get the book.



The book is waaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyy better.... the movie is very loose in its interpretation..... Q&A is a masterpiece, Slumdog was kinda.... cheesy



Hmmm... I'm a little curious now since you put it that way.  I'll check it out next time I'm in the book store.

Amazed_max50

410 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 7 months ago

 

Samantha,


I suggest reading book four and on in the Harry Potter series. That's where the book is actually better than the movie. Movies 1-3 where pretty much following the story in the book.


P.S. This may ruin some of the movies for you.

100_0097_max50

494 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 7 months ago

 

the Order of the Phoenix ithe the best book an of the series I feel, and thought they tried they didn't do the book justice with the film.


Heart of Darkness by Conrad is a good book but its movie Apocolips Now is I feel a better movie.


The Narnia series is a great set of books; I would suggest everyone to read them. The Jackel sucks compaired to the book. We can go on for hours, but sense my kids have 10 minutes left on their test I won't (got to go monitor).

Img_0898_max50

199 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 6 months ago

 

I read Twilight in less then a week (my reading record) and loved it.  I did not want to put it down.  It did what I wanted it to, it gave me additional information that the movie left me craving.  I am excited to read the next 3 books and see those movies as well.


 

Author__2__max50

55 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 6 months ago

 

My experience largely comes from movies made from Stephen King books or Ted Dekker books. They never capture the feel you get from reading.  Part of the beauty of reading is that your imagination pictures the characters, places, etc. in ways that a movie director cannot always bring out.


"In a completely rational society, the best of us would be teachers and the rest of us would have to settle for something less, because passing civilization along from one generation to the next ought to be the highest honor and the highest responsibility anyone could have."

-Lee Iacocca

John_and_tenzie_35_max50

2671 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 6 months ago

 

 Dear mrcrisp,


Slight correction - the movie "Apocalypse Now" isn't really the film of the novel "Heart of Darkness:' the setting, time, characters and plot have all been "inspired by" the book, but there are MANY differences:


 



"Heart of Darkness & Apocalypse Now:

A comparative analysis of novella and film



In the opening scenes of the documentary film "Hearts of Darkness-A Filmmaker's Apocalypse," Eleanor Coppola describes her husband Francis's film, "Apocalypse Now," as being "loosely based" on Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness. Indeed, "loosely" is the word; the period, setting, and circumstances of the film are totally different from those of the novella. The question, therefore, is whether any of Conrad's classic story of savagery and madness is extant in its cinematic reworking. It is this question that I shall attempt to address in this brief monograph by looking more closely at various aspects of character, plot, and theme in each respective work."


http://www.cyberpat.com/essays/coppola.html


But, as someone who was in Vietnam, I have to admit that, on the whole, the movie is pretty faithful to much of what I saw going on there (with some exceptions), and it's certainly MILES ahead of a travesty such as "The Deer Hunter", which was "Hollywood Vietnam", a film that many critics (who'd never been within 10,000 miles of the place) liked, but one which anyone who'd actually been there regarded as either a bad joke or an insult.


Coppola's idea to use Conrad's book to tell a story about Vietnam was, in my opinion, simply brilliant.


Nevertheless, to my mind, the BEST movie about Vietnam is Kubrick's "Full Metal Jacket."


As for the subject of this forum, I'd say the book is ALWAYS better. I much prefer actively exercising my own imagination to passively accepting that of someone else.

 





 


 


 

0 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 6 months ago

 

I will watch the movie if it seems interesting, I may or may not read the book. I will watch the movie even if I have read the book. I generally do the comparison thing in my head, but either way, I have been entertained. I just realized that most books cost more than a movie now!

John_and_tenzie_35_max50

2671 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 6 months ago

 

 Dear taternutz,


Not if you have a library card.  (And you can get movies there, too.)

0 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 6 months ago

 

Can't afford the gas to get there. I think I'll just pirate off the Internets instead haha!

100_0097_max50

494 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 6 months ago

 

arrr me maties,


But your no Johnny Depp, then again even he got killed. 


I was thinking of an older movie, Stargate. the movie was good; so I bought the


book and after that I couldn't watch the movie because they butchered it so badly.


If you have never read the book read it,  it is a great and very quick read.

Dressy_max50

462 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 4 months ago

 

Samantha says ...



I have never been one to read fictional romance novels but I recently saw the movie “Twilight” and am now interested in reading the book.  When it comes to books that have movies, in general, do you prefer reading the book or watching the movie?  Is it better to read the book and then see the movie or the other way around?  Do you ever show movies in your class either before or after reading the book? 


 


I almost refuse to watch a movie based on a book if I have read the book first. I hate how the movie is never like the book. I truly disliked the movie Twilight. I have read the entire series and found them very entertaining, but I watched the movie because my daughter just had to see it. It was very wrong. I did not think the actors portrayed the characters very well. They seemed to have very little spark in their movements and how they interacted with one another.


The movie could have been much better.



Every cloud has a silver lining.

Img_0898_max50

199 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 4 months ago

 

teacher_411-


Though I loved the movie, as I started and finished reading the books, my feelings about the characters in the movie are the same as yours.  The actors did not show as much emotion as I believe the characters did in the books.


 

Dressy_max50

462 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 2 months ago

 

I borrowed My Sister's Keeper  by Jodi Picoult from a colleague yesterday. The book is very good so far. Might watch the movie, but seriously doubt it. The book is way to good.


Every cloud has a silver lining.