General Forums >> Policy & Politics >> Israel vs. Palestine?
Israel vs. Palestine?
|
410 posts back to top |
Posted 10 months ago Which side do you think is right? Share your thoughts. Should the US get involved? With which side? |
|
2671 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Which side is right? HA! Neither and both. |
|
410 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago How do you figure? Israel is just protecting themselves from a terrorist runed government (Hamas/Palestine). Every attempt at diplomacy has failed. It just really gave Palestine a cease fire period in which they could resupply an then continue their assault on Israel. How can you use diplomacy when one side refuses to do so and is so ingrained in their culture that it is nearly impossible to do so. I think the US should not get involved and let Israel finanly just utterly destroy the Hamas fighters. Only then will Israel have peace. |
|
1583 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Peace cannot be attained through violence. Like all learning, peace must be modeled before it can be learned. "What the teacher is, is more important than what he teaches." - Karl Menninger |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago They have been fighting for thousands of years. Do NOT get involved. Nothing we do today will help. They will be fighting for a long time. |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Deven says ...
Tell that to the WWII vets. |
|
2671 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Dear taternitz, There's a difference between peace and victory. A lot of people I know are still fighting the Vietnam War. |
|
1583 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago I have told that to WWII vets, Korea vets and Vietnam vets. Actually, it was a vet who pointed this out to me and turned me onto to Gandhi.As John says, there is a HUGE difference between victory and peace. I am not saying that WWII did not need to be fought, just that one cannot expect peace to result from violence. It never has and never will. "What the teacher is, is more important than what he teaches." - Karl Menninger |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Well, here we will have to disagree. Gnork the caveman just killed Grog. Grog had been making Gnork's life miserable because he was bigger and stronger. Gnork was so distraught and nervous, he could no longer hunt and gather. His family began suffering. Gnork saw this and decided on what he had to do. After the deed was done, Gnork and his family now live a peacful life. Maybe our definitions of peace differ. The WAY war is fought is all wrong now. If you go to war, flatten them. Don't draw up imaginary lines and say you can't fight over there. Don't sy you can kill these guys but not those. Don't give it back to them. Turn them into something like Peurto Rico (you belong, but have no rights). As long as non-military politicians fight wars, we will never completley win. In the past, Kings were usually trained in the ways of war. I wonder how many politicians have read the "Art Of War"? |
|
410 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago What would you do if a country just randomly attacked the US with rockets, motars, RPG for six mos. launching over 6,300 mixed artilery? So then your saying you would do nothing for the sake of peace, with innocent victims of all types are ruthlessly murdered with no provocation. Also the enemy that is doing this is culturaly and publicly stated that they will continue to do so untill the US is obliterated. Would you still not fight, if not for the sake of peace but for self defense? |
|
410 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago On a side note, I think we should have our millitary's ground forces train in the Israeli's military. They can kick some serious but. They have beaten the Palestinians over and over (historically) but for the sake of peace, have always given them something back in return. Heck, they gave then the Gaza Strip (which was thriving and healthy economicly and inferstructure wise aswell) but the Palestinians have utterly destroyed them. The Palestinian's complain that the Jews have done this to them, that they are starving because of them. But let me tell you my friends, if lets say their terrorist government would spend more money on food and medicine for its people and not for ammunitions, then maybe they might be more prosperous then they are currently. |
|
1583 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago No, I'm not saying do nothing. I am saying that if you choose to respond with violence and manage to win, it will not bring peace. Peace is not merely the absence of a present battle. Peace is the eliminatrion of threat because you have reached an accord that is mutually beneficial. Look at World War One, for example. The Allies won the war, but there was no peace because the Treaty of Versailles that ended that war was unfair to Germany. The result was deep resentment which directly led to World War Two. Winning that war did not bring peace, either. There is no reason to expect that winning any war will bring peace. Peaceful settlements bring peace. "What the teacher is, is more important than what he teaches." - Karl Menninger |
|
410 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago But that is not possible when one party does not want to cooperate and completely annialate the other. The peace talks have been done; diplomacy has been attempted and failed. The Palestinian do nothing but create havok. The world would be a better place if they didn't exist. I have no sympothy for them....not when they choose to place their artillery near schools, hospitals and have such low disregard for human life. Palestinian men are terrorist, Palestinian women breed terrorist, and their children a terrorist clones. They are indoctrinated from children to do this and will continue until either that change that mindset or accomplish their goals. I say Israel should delete them from existence. |
|
677 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago MagPro85, You wrote, "The Palestinian do nothing but create havoc. The world would be a better place if they didn't exist. ...they choose to place their artillery near schools, hospitals and have such low disregard for human life. Palestinian men are terrorist, Palestinian women breed terrorist, and their children a terrorist clones. They are indoctrinated from children to do this and will continue until either that change that mindset or accomplish their goals. I say Israel should delete them from existence." This is like saying all liberals are Godless or all gay men are after little boys or every Christian follows the words of Jesus. It just ain't so my friend. Hamas has the Palestinian people living in Gaza fearful of speaking out against them. The problem is when an extreme faction with extreme views and missile/fire have the power. The United States should work with the international community, not on its own. The situation is more complex than your analysis . Thank God (Allah) you are not pushing the buttons. |
|
410 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago The Palestinian people would not except a peace treaty if there was one. Hamas was elected into power Hamas Charter...some exerts: Quote:
This is the status [of the land] in Islamic Shari’a, and it is similar to all lands conquered by Islam by force, and made thereby Waqf lands upon their conquest, for all generations of Muslims until the Day of Resurrection. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"Those who prepare for a raid in the path of Allah are considered as if they participated themselves in the raid. Those who successfully rear a raider in their home, are considered as if they participated in the raid" Quote:
Article Thirty Six The Hamas....does not seek fame for itself nor material gains, or social status. Nor is it directed against any one member of our people in order to compete with him or replace him....It will never set out against any Muslims or against the non-Muslims who make peace with it, here or anywhere else. It will only be of help to all associations and organizations which act against the Zionist enemy and those who revolve in its orbit... |
|
410 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago As you can see its not in their interest for any kind of peace. The US should not get involved (what would be the result). Should the US get involved then we would have yet another war in our hands. There would be no end to all the wars. Diplomacy has failed. |
|
677 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Once again an illogical premise. Hamas was "voted in" so they must speak for all Palestinians. The last I checked, Hamas had an approval rating among Palestinians that was falling. It fluctuates, but it was around 23 percent in 2003. By the way, Hamas has a terrorist wing. Its kind of like the clan is to bigoted white southerners. How many are going around lynching blacks? Reign it in a bit my man. |
|
410 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago 1-If Hamas is so good then why in the past decade have they always broken all peace treaties and attacked Israel? 2-Since Hamsa was "voted" into power, they had no interest in peace as depicted by their charter. If the Palestinians did not agree with Hamas wouldn't they have elcted some other group. Have you ever tried to rationalize evil? Can you explain to me why all of Germany (save a handful of good men) followed Hitler? |
|
410 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago dhastings says ... The United States should work with the international community, not on its own. For what? |
|
677 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Thanks MagPro85. On complex foreign matters such as the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. |
|
677 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago
1-If Hamas is so good then why in the past decade have they always broken all peace treaties and attacked Israel?
There you go. I NEVER said Hamas was so good. NEVER. I want you to see that not all Palestinians are evil. Wake up boy. Stay focussed!!! 2-Since Hamas was "voted" into power, they had no interest in peace as depicted by their charter. If the Palestinians did not agree with Hamas wouldn't they have elected some other group. Have you ever tried to rationalize evil? Can you explain to me why all of Germany (save a handful of good men) followed Hitler? (Isn't there a movie out about some Nazis that tried to stop Hitler?)
Again, stay focussed. I am not supporting Hamas. You have said that all Palestinians are Nazis in effect. Just like many Germans were anti Hitler but were afraid to speak out, so are many Palestinians afraid to speak out against Hamas. This is getting boring. I gather you to be a really bad listener because you don't really read what I am writing here. |
|
410 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago seems to be a theme on this blog. Welcome to my world. Its called selective reading. You will get used to it. |
|
677 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Hey, this is the best conversation we've had yet. Wait, it doesn't end there. I agree that Obama's statement about spreading the wealth was socialistic. I just hope that even with all the hype we can all see that he is trying to help the American People (by giving one of those plates with his face on it to everyone |
|
1583 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Tip O'Neill, the former speaker of the House of Representatives, is well known for saying "all politics is local. This is also true in the Middle East. Hamas did not win the election because of their ideology; they won because they promised to build schools, hospitals, and the economy. They won becausse they provided basic services like sanitation in areas where the then-current Palistinian government had not. Besides, they were elected in what was generally acknowledged to be a fair democratic election. Isn't that what the US has been promoting around the world? Is democracy onlty good if the 'right' people win? I am not supporting Hamas and more than I am supporting Israel when I point out that neither society is unified in opposition to the other. There are a great many Palestinians who want to work with and in Israel, and there are many Israelis who want to work with Palestinians. The first step toward peace, and the one you seem unwilling to take, is to acknowledge that the enemy, whoever they may be, are people just like yourself and, as such, have exactly the same right to existence that you do. When that happens it becomes very hard to shoot at them, bomb them or hate them. Whole countries that once wanted to wipe Israel off the map have been able to change their outlook because they recognized the humanity of their enemy, and you could too. When one makes rash comments like "the world would be a better place if they didn't exist," it sounds like Hitler talking. Is that really how any of us wish to be regarded? MagPro, I can prove that diplomacy works. None of us have shot at you and you, to the best of my knowledge, have not shot at any of us. Let's keep talking. "What the teacher is, is more important than what he teaches." - Karl Menninger |
|
410 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago If diplomacy works, then why has Hasas/Arafat broken every cease fire or every treaty ever created? They basicly except the peace treaty when they lose and then use that time to rearm and resupply their amunitions and then strike again. I agree diplomacy can work, but both parties have to participate for it to work. Not that I think the Israeli's will trust any of ther treaties given their past history. You can only talk with your enemy about the problem before you get blue in the face. In the last 6 mos or so Hamas has launced more than 6,000 rockets/motars at Israel with indiscriminate targets. Israel has finaly retaliated but has only targeted Hamas targets and not Gazans in general. Imagine if Israel would do the same thing as those terrorist thugs, there would be no Gaza let to fight over. |
|
1583 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Words are stronger than guns. Guns just build more resentment on both sides. Resentment lingers, which is why there is no peace after violence. Words create time for resentments to work themselves out, to change minds and hearts. Peace ensues. "What the teacher is, is more important than what he teaches." - Karl Menninger |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Check this out. Seems they are shooting at kids throwing rocks. |
|
2671 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago I spent over twenty years in the Middle East. The conflict between Israel and the Arabs is incredibly complex, and there are NO blacks or whites - only greys: E.G: The state of Israel was founded on land stolen from the Palestinians, land that they had been living on for many centuries. And the state of Israel came about, in part, through terrorism: "In 1944, with the end the war in sight, Irgun, now under the leadership of Menachem Begin , the future Prime Minister of Israel 1977-83, began to attack the British administration in Palestine, starting with bomb attacks on the immigration offices, tax offices and police stations. Because the war was not yet over these activities met with condemnation even from the Jewish Agency and Haganah, the main Jewish Defense Force, and the forerunner of the Israeli Army. This disapproval did not deter Irgun or the Stern Gang, and in 1944 the Stern gang murdered Lord Moyne the British Minister of state for the Middle East in Cairo, and started a series of bomb attacks on British installations.In November and 1945 there were some serious Arab Jewish riots in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. These riots were put down by the 3rd Parachute Brigade part of the newly arrived 6th Airborne division. These riots lasted seven days resulting in some loss of life.During December 1945, the focus of the Jewish attacks shifted to RAF airfields, police stations and armories. There was frequent exchanges of fire and some loss of life on both sides. The High commissioner, Lord Gort , left Palestine in November 1945 and was replaced by another British general Sir Allan Cunningham. Cunningham decided to mount a major blow against the IZL and on the 28 to June 1946, 17,000 British troops flooded into Jerusalem to carry out Operation Agatha. The Jewish Agency offices were raided, arms found and the agency shut down, with a large number of Jews suspected of terrorism being arrested. Jewish terrorists soon started planning the a reprisal for Operation Agatha and made plans for the bombing attack on the King David hotel (91 people were killed, most of them British.)" smallwars.com/Palestine/kidnap.htm">http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Palestine/kidnap.htm
The Arabs, of course, have used terrorism as a weapon for decades there. Here is a list of JUST the incidents in 2008: Jan 15, 2008 - Carlos Andrés Mosquera Chávez, a 21-year-old volunteer from Quito, Ecuador, was killed by a Palestinian sniper from the Gaza Strip as he was working in the fields of Kibbutz Ein Hashlosha. The Hamas Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades claimed responsibility for the shooting. Probably the BEST book on the subject is this:
|
|
5 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Just to give you an idea of the average, "I'm just trying to live my life and do my own thing," muslim male, let me tell you a few things I've learned from my Yemeni friends who work down the street from me. It's okay for men to cheat on their wives but women may not or they will be killed for it. If the husband can't or won't do it, one of the wife's male family members will do it. This is simply the way they have always been taught to believe. They believe that women have no other social value other than breeding. Again, how they are raised. Women are taught that from the time her husband awakens until the time he retires to bed, her every thought and deed are to please him. No wonder they don't want us coming in and displacing their traditions, eh? They -- Mike, Yusef, and Ali -- all voted for Obama and are very excited about it. This disturbs me. Verbatim from my sociology textbook (penned by a rabid liberal, I might add), "Sociology, A Down-to-Earth Approach": "Worldwide, between 100 million and 200 million females have been circumcised. In Egypt, 97 percent of the women have been circumcised.....Among most groups, the surgery takes place between the ages of 4 and 8. In some cultures, it occurs seven to ten days after birth. In others, it is not performed until girls reach adolescence. Because the surgery is usually done without anesthesia, the pain is so excruciating that adults must hold the girl down." It goes on to describe the different methods they use such as, clitoridectomy, labiadectomy, infibulation, depending on how much tissue is removed. See, the women don't get to enjoy sex. Ever. And even more bizarre, it is mostly women that do the 'surgery.' Now take a wild guess what religion they all practice. I dare you. I double-dog dare you. So before I get any indignant replies that I'm not being sensitive or understanding, let me say that I am NOT understanding of why this barbaric treatment of women persists -- publicly and proudly -- in so many countries, Muslim countries, and we are the only nation outraged enough to do anything about it. So yeah, Islam, regardless of all its peaceful rhetoric, still turns a blind eye to peace. There's nothing anyone can say to make me feel any differently, and besides that, where are the so-called 'peaceful' muslims who are against radical Islamists? They may not condone this craziness, but they aren't outraged either. This is a prime example (Lord help me) of what MagPro was saying. These people, maintaining and encouraging that kind of mindset, can only be viewed as barbaric, animalistic, and unevolved. When will they join the rest of the world? Culture is a construct, not innate. Therefore, their culture - despite how many of them there are - is effectively holding the rest of the world back from progress. They're enthusiastic about having our weapons and technology, but balk at anything that might threaten their perverse worldview. It's fine to take money and aid from the infidels, but we're horrible for wanting their women to have equal rights and education. There is no give and take in any Western countries' relationships with the Middle East. Johnslat argues that the land was stolen from the Palestinians, but in truth, that land belonged to the Hebrews (Jews) in Bible times. Furthermore, it doesn't matter who it belonged to 60 years ago. Our land belonged to the Native Americans not too long before that. You may disagree, but I believe that the US's presence in the world is necessary and right, regardless of how we came to be a country. I also believe that Israel's presence in the Middle East is necessary and right. And it makes me feel a little safer knowing that there is a sane, powerful group of people with a strong and influential army in the Middle East to balance things out. God bless Israel. |
|
677 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago
Kayla's Daddy,
Do you remember those Mormons in Texas? They think they are blessed too.
John and Paul (no not that John and Paul) said it best, "Let It Be!"
A huge problem arises when small children (Palestinian, Latter Day Saintian etc...) and innocent women get hurt.
The real problem is religion, not culture.
I am always turned off when I hear someone say a country is blessed. It's like saying, we have God on our side and those are the bad people.
No one should abuse anyone including God.
|
).