Become a Teacher >> Browse Articles >> Continuing Education
How Important Are Grades?
Laura Owen | TheApple.com
Report cards have been a part of the educational experience for decades. They are essential to informing parents of student progress and traditionally serve as the overall measure of assessment of a child’s success in school. Currently, the teachers and administrators at my elementary school are taking a closer look at our report cards. Elementary school report cards often include a list of subjects, work habits, and conduct areas followed by the letter grade the child earned in each area. Schools may require a teacher to attach comments, but these comments typically vary in length and thoroughness.
Some schools have moved away from using letter grades, instead reporting progress through teacher composed narratives. These schools often have specific guidelines for teachers to assure that all areas are addressed in the narrative. In trying to determine what format best fits my school’s philosophy and population, we have begun to analyze the necessity of letter grades. This process has sparked a conversation about what we truly believe about assessment. In many current education models, assessment is part of a cyclical model serving as part of the learning process.
According to leaders in the field, the true purpose of assessment is to evaluate a student’s level of understanding, and should be used to provide appropriate feedback and guidance in planning future instruction. I agree with these views, and use day-to-day assessments in this way in my own classroom. However, I have never stopped to consider whether traditional letter grades on a report card would conflict with the notion of assessment.
In my reflections, I have found myself getting stuck on a couple of questions that challenge the traditions of report cards to which I have grown accustomed: Should we be reporting letter grades and what do they really mean? If a child receives and “A” on his report card, what does that tell me? Does an “A” indicate that the child has mastery of everything covered during the grading period? Maybe. Does the child have strengths that brought the grade up and areas of weakness that a parent may benefit from knowing?
What about a “C”? Does that mean that the child partially understands the concepts or does the child have mastery of some concepts and not others? If that is the case, what doesn’t the child understand? Or, if we actually looked in the teacher’s grade book, would a “C” instead mean that the child bombed a few tests or failed to turn in some assignments? And, to complicate matters further, we all know that an “A” in one class could mean something totally different than an “A” in another. How far does subjectivity encroach upon the grades that children take home on their report cards? I pose all of these questions without answers. However, I think it is something worth exploring more closely.
I have always struggled with the theory that we need to do away with traditional grades in order to lessen competitiveness and protect a child’s self-esteem. I believe that children and parents need honest feedback on school performance. However, I question whether letter grades should be used as the primary method of communication. I also believe that because our society is accustomed to letter grades, parents and students have a general understanding of what each grade means. However, I wonder if just a general understanding is acceptable.
Although I understand the benefits of omitting letter grades, I can’t help but consider how I would feel as a parent if my child brought home a report card with only a long narrative of teacher comments. I know that I would appreciate the insight and the effort of the teacher, but ultimately I may be left wondering what letter grade my child actually earned.



BSimpson
2 months ago
22 comments
lcooper: You are right that teacher comments may be ambiguous - and potentially very subjective. But I would rather help students feel a sense of achievement for actually learning and achieving something other than a letter grade. A grade is an extrinsic motivator. Ideally, I prefer to help students find their own intrinsic motivation - a passion for learning and what they can accomplish when they apply what they've learned.
lcooper
4 months ago
6 comments
I believe that maintaining letter grades is important. Students need to learn from an early age that there is some level of accountability for their quality of work. When students reach college their grades will be in letter form. I believe that it would put future college students at an emotional and psychological disadvantage to go through school receiving teacher commentary, and then face the cold, hard reality of "scoring" in college. It would be one more enormous transition that would have to be made. I think it is inaccurate to say that letter grades (or number grades) are a comparison of students. I believe they are more a reflection of the student's ability to meet, exceed, or (unfortunately) fail to meet the "standard" set by the educator for that particular class. I do believe, however, that more input and commentary from the teachers regarding the student's performance in the class could only be beneficial. But let's not take away that feeling of achievement students get when they work very hard and get that "A", or raise their grade from a D to a B+ with lots of extra hard work. Let's give them something to strive for and achieve, rather than (potentially) ambiguous teacher commentary.
BSimpson
4 months ago
22 comments
I am completely against grades - letters or numbers. I don't think they tell me anything - but I don't like to compare children to each other and I think that's the only benefit of these types of grades. I much prefer narratives, anecdotal records, and checklists of skills and knowledge.
rrosener
7 months ago
4 comments
Keep in mind there are 2 types of assessments: those of learning and those for learning. We need to use both to teach and report. There needs to be a uniform system to measure skills and content learned, but also needs to be explanations.
debo
7 months ago
132 comments
For my first few years as a Gifted Ed teacher I did not grade anything, at all, ever. Instead the student and I would have a talk about their project. I would listen to their ideas, interpretations and opinions... then I might suggest an extension of the project, or a new project that related to his/her thoughts... or, I might just ask, "Where do you want to go with this concept?"
I believe the most important part of giving feedback is the LISTENING done by the teacher.
carlo
7 months ago
8 comments
I guess any type of grading system tells, to a point, how the student performed in class. It could also be an indicator of how a student might perform in college and ultimately as a professional. But, of course, there would always be Steve Jobs who would show us that some things just can't be graded.
hatesstarwars
7 months ago
22 comments
My son is in the 5th grade and his report card is a combo of letter grades and the work habits list,the only problem with that is she gives him "S" satisfactory on his work habits,when that just isn't true. For example he has really struggled with turning work in on time,he is continually late yet she marks "S" on his report card. What Gives.?? Does anyone else see this in their childs report cards?
surveillance1908
7 months ago
28 comments
I believe in letter grades. I also believe that schools/districts need to adopt some type of uniformity when it comes to 'how' grades are derived. For example, some educators count homework 50% and then others might count it 10%. How is this a true measure of learning. I firmly believe that most grades should be given based on classwork. I do not go home with my students so I can't guarantee that they have support at home or even the conditions to complete assignments.
So before we move to eliminate 'grades', I think we should look at how we calculate them.
dhastings
7 months ago
210 comments
I think feedback for students and parents is essential, but report cards seem too broad. I'm moving to the school where they use narrative.
Miyumi
7 months ago
40 comments
The elementary school report cards I recall had the "grades" being, E for excellent, S for satisfactory I for improving, NI for Needs Improvement. It then graded me on each subject area and then areas such as responsibility (which stood for turning work in on time) participation, effort, and other such things. My parents could then easily see that the area which I needed the most work was participation, instead of participation bringing down my grade for other things.
I think the letter grade is necessary only because of parent's reactions to there not being one. Competition is indeed healthy, and kids will seek it out wherever they can find it. If they are not given a "safe" competition, such as grades, they will find an unsafe one (involving drugs and/or alcohol).
But, I think that a grading system such as I remember from elementary school would be great in every class in the upper grades. If each teacher is sending all those elements above, with the subject matter grades being broken into the content standards covered, it would be a lot more informative. And, if it's done with the E, S, I, NI, then the parents don't have to decipher or skim through a long narrative. It won't take them long to scan over and see where their child got an NI, and then they can compare it throughout the classes. Does the child have NI in timeliness across the board, or is it only in English?
I seem to recall getting a report card similar to that in one of my high schools...
sanmccarron
7 months ago
1216 comments
My thoughts are posted here: http://sanmccarron.blogspot.com/2009/03/fail.html
mrcrisp
7 months ago
88 comments
I assess everyday, the kids hate taking a quiz everyday, but it helps me know if i need to reteach. It also helps me get the students ready for state test (I give the quiz in State Test format). With that said I have to say I like Number grades, this is the mean that your kid earned. I can handle the Letter grade to go along with it, but a narrative, now that would be bad I would just hope I could use Word with it.
palette
7 months ago
4 comments
An Asst. Principal I used to teach under, advised me that with all the State imposed assessments, it would not be long until teacher's grades were obsolete. I highly resent having that privilege taken from me. I doubt that some parents would remain calm and objective when they read the narratives that my colleagues and I would write about a few students. (Unless we had a preset list of comments to choose from, that would standardize the process). On-the-other-hand, there are students that do exemplary work, that would be deprived of the honor, dignity, and recognition of a letter grade. I have a better idea: let's limit our assessments to progress-only. And not make it public or tie it to Federal and/or State received funds. The down-side of a no-assessment system is that it would put a few testing companies out of business. The up-side is: teachers could concentrate on teaching the curriculum, instead of "teaching to the test" or trying to keep up with benchmarks. Good teachers would not worry being terminated because they are not improving the AYP and API (Average Yearly Performance and Academic Performance Index). Students would not suffer stress-related illnesses like migraines, ulcers, dermatitis, ad infinitum. Parents either stress out or go to the other extreme.--They're absentee parents. Grades are fine the way they are. If it works, don't fix it. They are many other educational issues that need attention.
imbeni84
7 months ago
2 comments
Rdedominicis: I agree with you. I taught high school English for a year, and realized very quickly that the students felt as though they were entitled to pass just for showing up. I was at two different schools (covering maternity leaves and whatnot); the second school I was at was horrible for this feeling of desensitization. They actually had a raffle system, where the student got a "ticket" if they went so many weeks (I think it was 3) without being late, being written up, or failing to turn in any work or being a problem. At the end of the 3 weeks, they did a huge drawing, and students won a variety of different prizes (everything from free tickets to a sporting event to gift cards and the like). I did not participate, partially because I couldn't remember to turn my tickets in, but mostly because I thought it was a stupid idea. Students shouldn't be rewarded for doing what THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO DO. It seems that the school was preparing them to think that they were entitled to everything and that they would get what they want without putting in the work. I threatened my seniors with failure several times, and I had one senior who had the gall to tell me that I couldn't fail him. I merely looked at him and said "watch me".
Natsunekko: Your son seems to be like many other students. I noticed that I had many students who would do very well on tests, yet still had a 'D' or 'F' because of their failure to turn in assignments. I understand your concern that your son's grade may not accurately reflect all of his knowledge in a particular content area. However, for many school systems, work that is turned in is the main, if not only, means that a teacher has of evaluating the student. It is difficult to explain to someone why a child is failing or if a child understands the material if there is no work to back it up. Tests are not always indicative of whether the student truly knows the material or not. Depending on the subject, it is possible for the student to "learn" enough to pass the test.
Whether it's right or not, in most cases, grades do play a large part in determining a child's placement in future classes. However, students must take the responsibility of turning in their work upon themselves if they want their grade to truly reflect their knowledge. The teacher can only do so much.
joy2educ8
7 months ago
16 comments
jlweeter,
In the process of developing the system we use now, we went to a standards based system like you suggest. Report cards were 20 pages long per student, and were even more tedious than they are now, because we had to address how we were going to help the child in every situation, It was a nightmare!