Resources >> Browse Articles >> Assessment, Grading & Evaluations

+14

11 Grammar Mistakes to Avoid

Monster

Professional writers often worry that their work is unnecessary. After all, can’t anyone with even a basic education write? The answer: no, they can’t. Even college graduates don’t seem to be learning composition basics.

Of course not everyone is going to be the next Mark Twain, but career success does depend on avoiding certain errors. It takes just one person to see just one mistake for you to be discounted.

Avoid these 11 mistakes, write better, and get the job!

FIRST MISTAKE



Share |
+14
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    FROMUSA

    2 days ago

    38 comments

    Wholesale
    ,China Wholesale,wholesale products,wholesale supplies,cheap wholesale,Dropship from China,Laptop Accessories,Computer Accessories,Computer Accessories Wholesale,Laptop Accessories Wholesale,Laptop Computer Accessories,Laptop Parts,laptop battery,laptop batteries,Laptop AC Adapter,Laptop Keyboard,LCD Panel. http://www.aboutbuys.com

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    ericcole

    5 months ago

    2 comments

    Wrong! None is both Singular and Plural
    Heritage Dictionary: "the word has been used as both a singular and a plural noun from Old English onward. The plural usage appears in the King James Bible as well as the works of John Dryden and Edmund Burke and is widespread in the works of respectable writers today." http://www.grammarmudge.cityslide.com/articles/article/1026513/9903...

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    ShadowFox

    5 months ago

    2 comments

    I've often been struck by a common inability of English teachers--at least, those practicing in the US--to distinguish style from substance. This is why it comes as no surprise that a site such as The Apple puts out a list of "11 grammar mistakes" that are, with apologies to Mike Myers and Saturday Night Live, neither grammar nor mistakes. My advice to teachers is much simpler--avoid advice from advice-column grammarians. Every one of the 11 recommendations deals with style, not substance of writing. The recommendations are for avoiding particular elements of style, not substantive grammatical errors. Teachers would be better off to focus on the substance of writing and less on style. Once their students know how to write, they will be ready to learn how to write well.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    tbstoller

    5 months ago

    2 comments

    "Affect" used as a noun refers to emotions, and more specifically the facial expression showing emotions, which made more sense in the example sentence. A psychologist might describe a person with depression as having a "flat affect", meaning the person's face shows no emotions.

    It does not mean "an artificial air someone puts on", which is, by the way, a horrible sentence! Used as a verb, someone can "affect an air", meaning to feign a behavior in a pretentious way.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    caiocamargo

    5 months ago

    2 comments

    "Fewer brains"? Seriously? Sigh. If you're going to perpetuate this silly rule, at least get it right. "Brains," in this usage, doesn't mean a number of discrete central nervous systems, but a metonymy for intelligence. As such, it is used as a mass noun (something akin to "brain matter") rather than a count noun, and therefore, according to the rule you're illustrating with the example, it would be "less brains" rather than "fewer brains."

    Excuse me while I shed a tear for the English language.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    parse

    5 months ago

    2 comments

    It's ironic that you haven't followed the rule you have proposed in "Prevarication Junction": If you really don't know what you're talking about. . . don't talk about it. If you had resisted your own advice to avoid citing "studies" that support your written assertions, you might have been forced to consult some expert sources and discovered that some of your claims are just plain wrong and others have nothing to do with grammar. To educate yourself, you might try looking at the very helpful and enjoyable "Language Log" blog, where linguist Geoffrey K. Pullam details your many errors.

  • Phil_lacefield_relaxing_max50

    PhilLacefield

    5 months ago

    4 comments

    Another important RULE to remember: PLEASE use the case of verbs correctly! Please! For example: Say, "I AM going to the store (NOT "I IS going to the store"). And please say, "She GOES to the store (NOT "She GO to the store"). English verb conjugation (which I hope is still being taught in schools) is: I AM, you ARE; he, she, it IS. And, I GO; you GO; he, she, it GOES. Sincerely, in the Hope of Better Spoken English Language for all Americans, Phil Lacefield

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    gromitk9

    5 months ago

    4 comments

    Firstly: To those who object to the whole point of the article on grounds that it's too picky: That other aspects of writing are more important (true) does not mean that grammar does not matter. That the quake in Haiti did much more harm than my failure to use my turn signal yesterday could have does not mean my turn signals don't matter.

    The first post stole most of my thunder: Yes, many of the entries are matters of style, not grammar at all. Also, some of the rest are matters of word meaning, not syntax (the way words are combined). I'm not sure if semantics should be considered part of grammar at all (I'm not sure if it it), because it's so much broader in scope.

    Does grammar matter only if getting it wrong interfere with communication? Yes--but the little things *DO* matter. They're like a fine grit that gums up the reading process. To clarify, I refer again to the Haiti/turn signal analogy.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    gromitk9

    5 months ago

    4 comments

    Firstly: To those who object to the whole point of the article on grounds that it's too picky: That other aspects of writing are more important (true) does not mean that grammar does not matter. That the quake in Haiti did much more harm than my failure to use my turn signal yesterday could have does not mean my turn signals don't matter.

    The first post stole most of my thunder: Yes, many of the entries are matters of style, not grammar at all. Also, some of the rest are matters of word meaning, not syntax (the way words are combined). I'm not sure if semantics should be considered part of grammar at all (I'm not sure if it it), because it's so much broader in scope.

    Does grammar matter only if getting it wrong interfere with communication? Yes--but the little things *DO* matter. They're like a fine grit that gums up the reading process. To clarify, I refer again to the Haiti/turn signal analogy.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    triovlaif

    5 months ago

    6 comments

    The focus is on writing, of course, not speech; however, I think all of these "errors" show how much speech and writing are interconnected and what drive there is to have our writing reflect our speech. " 've" is seen less often than "of" in print, so the spelling error is understandable. I remember making it when I was in school. English spelling is a formidable challenge.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    triovlaif

    5 months ago

    6 comments

    If it sounds a little off, however, it will probably not last as a singular form. The trouble with "none" is that it doesn't match the concept of the speaker even though it is the most common choice to express the idea "they aren't there." That "none" probably derived from "not one" is no longer transparent to the speaker. We say "you" today to refer to one person; however, "you" was originally plural, and not only that but it was also the accusative case. The equivalent would be to say "Us is wrong." Language changes and the changes don't always make sense. Most of the "mistakes" discussed in this article are probably changes underway and there will be no stopping them. The English-speaking community is making up its mind about them. One last addition: look at the comma situation. In lists of three or more things, I was taught that there should be a comma between the last two items. I didn't know this was called the Oxford comma, however. Then we went through a time when we were told not to use the comma. Now it is optional. Not the clearest or most consistent guidelines to be found!

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    triovlaif

    5 months ago

    6 comments

    To say that using "less" instead of "fewer" when "fewer" is required shows less intelligence and fewer brains is cute but incorrect. It probably shows a change in the language. This is one of the most irritating developments to me, but it does seem that the language is losing "fewer" in favor of "less" when the noun is countable.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    crystinhart

    5 months ago

    4 comments

    One common grammatical error is the comparision of well with good. For example, when asked, "How are you?" A common response is, "I am good." The correct reply should be, " I am well." As a teacher of English Language Learners, part of my job is to teach Standard American English.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    RochelleSC

    5 months ago

    14 comments

    In my humble opinion, I find SPELLING errors to be the most obvious and off-putting in written communication, followed by GRAMMAR errors, then PUNCTUATION errors. As the daughter of a retired elementary school teacher (and a secondary teacher myself), I've sadly been informed in the last decade that these fine points of language are no longer considered 'essential' due to the fact that SPELLCHECKER or GRAMMARCHECKER can be used when creating on word software! How I wish that the only time I ever had to write anything was on the computer! Once upon a time, prospective employers would use mistakes like these to weed out applicants.... now the employers frequently don't notice the mistakes themselves!

  • Profile_max50

    bpicmc

    5 months ago

    6 comments

    If you are going to call a list "11 Grammar Mistakes to Avoid," the list should focus on issues of grammar. The first item about "constipated clauses" and the one about the weasel expressions are issues of style not grammar. The "etc." entry, while addressing grammar, focused mostly on style. In principle, I agree with RainbowButterfly that grammar should mainly before an issue when it interferes with the communication of the message at hand. However, we need to remind our students about register and dialectical style and word choice. As my Bilingualism professor always says, the standard dialect is a dialects with an army and a navy, but it is still only a dialect. We need to focus on making students capable users of multiple level of written and spoken language rather than harping on minor grammar points.

What's the Scoop?

Post a link to something interesting from another site, or submit your own original writing for the TheApple community to read.

Report News Here

Recent Activity

Photo_user_blank_big
mommak received the quiz result of "Play among the kids as a K-8 teacher!", about 3 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
kkirby808 is ranked No.2 for the day in The Game, about 3 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
kkirby808 is ranked No.2 for the day in The Game, about 3 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
kkirby808 is ranked No.2 for the day in The Game, about 3 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
kkirby808 is ranked No.2 for the day in The Game, about 3 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
kkirby808 is ranked No.2 for the day in The Game, about 3 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
kkirby808 is ranked No.2 for the day in The Game, about 3 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
kkirby808 is ranked No.2 for the day in The Game, about 3 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
kkirby808 is ranked No.2 for the day in The Game, about 3 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
kkirby808 is ranked No.2 for the day in The Game, about 3 hours ago.